Poker is meant to be a game of independent skill, where each player makes decisions on their own. Collusion disrupts this balance, occurring when two or more players secretly cooperate to try to gain an unfair advantage over others.
Being able to recognise collusion is important, whether you play online or in a club, as it can help you spot irregular behaviour and avoid being drawn into compromised games. By understanding how collusion works, you can focus on genuine decision-making at the table, rather than hidden agreements between players.
This blog post explains what collusion looks like, why it matters, how online platforms tackle it, the potential consequences for those involved, and practical steps you can take to protect yourself while playing.

Collusion quietly shifts how players act and can unsettle the foundation of poker. Early signs might simply feel like certain decisions do not match the open information on the table. Later, you might learn that this arises from private coordination, which changes the meaning of every action taken.
Collusion also influences the atmosphere at the table. If players sense unseen cooperation, the dynamics shift, making it harder to read situations. People may feel the game is no longer being conducted as intended.
Understanding how collusion operates makes unusual patterns easier to identify and helps maintain confidence in fair play. Recognising these signs allows players to step back if something feels out of place, ensuring their decisions are based on skill rather than hidden arrangements.
Online, collusion can be more concrete. It might involve players sharing hole-card information through private channels, showing leniency toward each other when strong cards appear, or directing chips to one another to gain extra value.
More coordinated collusive moves can also occur. Partners may build pots together to corner another player, or fold in situations that only make sense if they already know an associate’s hand. Some use off-platform signals to coordinate decisions across several tables.
Because collusion undermines fair competition, operators forbid it and conduct ongoing monitoring. Even though platforms actively check for unusual patterns, understanding what collusion looks like helps players evaluate their surroundings and maintain confidence in the fairness of the game.
In the UK, collusion is considered cheating in both online rooms and physical venues. Operators are responsible for upholding fair play and enforcing rules that prohibit hidden cooperation.
If collusion is identified, the consequences can be significant. Players might be removed from games, accounts may be suspended or closed, and funds linked to collusion might be held back. Prizes or cash may be reassigned to affected players where the operator can reasonably determine the impact.
More serious or organised collusion may be referred to authorities, particularly if it involves fraud or other illegal activity, or shared with other operators to prevent recurrence. Adhering to house rules and avoiding collusion helps maintain fairness for all participants.
Operators combine automated tools with human review to identify patterns that deviate from typical play. Early signs of potential collusion might include the same accounts frequently occupying the same seats. Later checks may reveal repeated leniency between those accounts or coordinated betting that only makes sense if information is being exchanged.
They also review match-up outcomes, timing tendencies, and decisions made in similar situations. Technical measures such as device analysis, location checks, and links between accounts outside the table may highlight possible collusion.
If an automated system flags unusual behaviour, integrity teams examine evidence across multiple sessions and stakes. Player reports of suspected collusion, particularly with hand histories or examples, are also investigated.
Operators generally act promptly once collusion is verified. Individuals may be removed from games or tournaments, and accounts may be suspended or closed while investigations are finalised.
Financial outcomes depend on the case. Winnings linked to collusion may be confiscated, and affected players may receive redistributed funds if the impact can be reasonably assessed. Tournament placements may be adjusted, and prizes or entries voided.
Persistent or organised collusion can result in permanent bans and may be reported to other operators or authorities if illegal activity is suspected. Sites may also request further identification and maintain detailed records for potential disputes.
These measures help maintain the integrity of poker, ensuring that outcomes reflect skill rather than secret coordination.
Using well-regulated platforms is a strong starting point, as these sites maintain oversight and enforce rules against collusion. If something at the table seems unusual, using the platform’s reporting tools, with hand references where possible, helps ensure fair play.
Watch for patterns that stretch credibility, such as two accounts repeatedly avoiding pressure against each other while pressing everyone else, or chip movements that do not match the flow of the hand. Reviewing your own hand histories may reveal repeated collusion patterns.
Keep your account secure and avoid situations where hidden coordination could occur. Be cautious in private tables or externally arranged games, where oversight may be weaker, and consider the fairness of repeatedly returning to tables populated by the same cluster of accounts.
Approaching play with awareness and care helps ensure that your poker experience is determined by skill, strategy, and fair competition. Setting sensible limits, taking breaks, and avoiding risking essential funds are all part of responsible play. If gambling begins affecting your well-being or finances, organisations such as GamCare and GambleAware offer free and confidential support.
**The information provided in this blog is intended for educational purposes and should not be construed as betting advice or a guarantee of success. Always gamble responsibly.